In
a previous issue, I used a quote by Albert Schweitzer,
which basically teaches that those who are happiest in
life are those who have sought and discovered how to serve
others. I pointed out how that quote reminds me of the
free-enterprise system, where the amount of money one
makes is often directly proportional to how many people
they serve (through providing products and/or services
that others want and/or need).
Immediately
after the issue was distributed, I received the following
letter:
"Bob,
I like the Albert Schweitzer quote but I think you are
stretching it a bit to relate it to making money and is
a wrong use of the quote. Letting yourself down there,
Bob."
That's
fine. We all have a right to our opinions, and she might
be correct. Since I've been wrong so often in my life,
it's difficult for me not to consider that as a legitimate
possibility :-).
I'm
always grateful when readers take the time to respond
to my articles. That way, I know you're out there, you're
considering what I'm saying and, your perceptive insights
provide me with a different perspective on my subject
matter.
Being
that the issue's feature article was on how to offer advice
in a way that would cause a person to be more receptive
to it, I shared with her some ideas in a personal letter.
I'll now share my thoughts with you.
The
writer's opening sentence was...
<<"Bob,
I like the Albert Schweitzer quote but I think you are
stretching it a bit to relate it to making money and is
a wrong use of the quote.>>
It
was excellent that she opened by letting me know she enjoyed
the quote. This made me feel very receptive to what she
would say next. That's always an effective way to begin
the persuasion process.
In
continuing the sentence, she let me know where she disagreed.
That's also great. However, in order to make the reader
(in this case, me) more receptive, I might have said,
"In my opinion, you are stretching it a bit to relate
it to making money and this could possibly be an incorrect
use of the quote."
Saying,
"In my opinion" tells the person that he is not being
*told* something or chastised, but rather that the writer's
opinion is such. As noted last week, that makes the actual
upcoming "chastisement" a lot more acceptable to the reader.
Then, the phrase, "...could possibly be an incorrect use
of the quote" leaves room for the recipient to "breathe."
If one says, "could possibly be", that is much more acceptable
to the recipient's ego than the word "is." And, saying,
"incorrect use" more acceptable than the word, "wrong."
(Also, notice I omitted the word "but" and that way, "In
my opinion" simply begins another sentence. The word,
"but" signals disagreement and is better left either unused,
or substituted with "and.")
The
next sentence was:
<<"Letting
yourself down there Bob.">>
Here,
I'd have to wonder what the writer wished to communicate
to me. If one's intention is to hurt the recipient's feelings
or show a bit of personal disappointment, I'd imagine
that particular wording is a good way to get their point
across. It might, however, also make the recipient defensive
and less likely to be willing to change. I'm assuming
that people read WWI so they can learn how to persuade
others (positively) into being receptive to their ideas
and even accept them as their own. In that case, the sentence
might not achieve its intended goal.
When
writing a persuasive letter, I always ask myself, "Is
this a sentence that might make a person receptive *to*
my idea or defensive *about* it...thus resistant to it?"
Naturally,
I let the person who wrote me the letter know that these
are just my thoughts and certainly don't mean I'm correct.
And, you know what? She just might be very right regarding
my usage of the quote. I'll have to consider her suggestion
and ask a couple of others as well, but her observation
is a good one.
Here's
a quick look at how I might slightly adjust her letter
in order to take her excellent observation and possibly
improve the method of persuasive communication.
<<"Bob,
Thank you for the great information in your newsletter.
I really like the Albert Schweitzer quote. In my opinion,
comparing his quote with free-enterprise is stretching
it a bit and could possibly be an incorrect use of the
quote. Again, enjoy your publication. Keep up the great
work."
Pardon
me for appearing to compliment my own newsletter, however,
to illustrate a point, that technique happens to be an
effective way to immediately trigger a person's receptivity
button and get past the "gatekeeper of their mind"...their
ego.
When
writing a letter of critique, ask yourself, "What am I
attempting to accomplish and, does what I'm writing increase
my chances of doing so?"
I'm
glad to have you with us. Have an awesome WINNING WITHOUT
INTIMIDATION week!
Bob
Burg
Bob
Burg is author of "Winning Without Intimidation"
and "Endless Referrals." To receive 20% off on Bob's
products visit www.YourSuccessStore.com
or call 877-929-0439. |